Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 2.5 kg Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16 Laptop Review: Low-priced 16-inch laptop with a GeForce GPU Review » Dell Core i7 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop Review: No Core i9 Nonsense Review » Dell G5 15 5500 Laptop Review: Aspirational mid-ranger let down by a sub-par displayĭell Core i7 4K UHD: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2 kg
Review » Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI Laptop Review: Gaming Multimedia Hybridĭell G5 15 5500 09E2: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60", 2.3 kg Review » Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Laptop Review: $1000 USD for GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Graphics is Too MuchĪsus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44 Laptop Review: AMD dating NvidiaĪsus ROG Strix G15 G512LI: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.3 kg Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile graphics cardĪcer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT: AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, 15.60", 2.2 kg The power efficient Max-Q variant of the GTX 1650 Ti is rated at 35 Watt TGP. The power consumption of the 1650 Ti for laptops is specified at 50 - 80 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia and therefore 5 - 25 Watt higher than the GTX 1650.
This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.Ĭompared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches.